Accessibility links Skip to main content

Navigating SAF documentation: Common challenges and best practices

As Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) adoption continues to grow under Aviation Regulations, documentation quality and traceability have become key areas of focus during reporting of SAF and verification activities. While SAF offers significant environmental benefits, demonstrating compliance requires operators to maintain accurate, complete, and verifiable records throughout the reporting period. Based on our experience supporting aviation stakeholders with compliance and verification activities, several recurring challenges have emerged. Fortunately, many of these issues can be addressed through early planning and proactive engagement with fuel suppliers and competent authorities.

Continue reading
A passenger plane is being prepared for departure during ground handling operations at the airport.

Challenges faced

Several issues have been observed in Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) documentation, including inconsistencies in documents issued by different fuel suppliers, lack of harmonization in document formats, Proof of Compliance (POC) documents issued after the expiry of certificates and instances where POCs have been issued, cancelled, and subsequently reissued. Highlighting these common documentation issues aims to raise awareness among operators and encourage them to engage with their fuel suppliers well in advance to clarify and resolve any potential concerns. Proactive coordination can help streamline the verification process, reduce delays, and save valuable time during verification activities. 

Engage with fuel suppliers early 

One of the most effective ways to reduce SAF reporting and verification challenges is to establish communication with fuel suppliers well before the reporting deadline.

Operators should seek clarity on: 

  • The SAF documentation that will be provided 
  • Sustainability certificates supporting the SAF volume 
  • The expected timeline for certificate delivery, including whether certificates will be issued monthly, quarterly, or at year-end 

As mentioned already, addressing these points early can help avoid getting large number of documents at last-minute and reduce delays during SAF emissions reduction reporting. 

Clarify regulatory expectations 

As regulatory guidance continues to evolve, operators should proactively engage with their respective competent authorities to understand specific authorities’ expectations, if any.

Attention should be given to: 

  • Acceptance of sustainability documents (For e.g. some authorities accepted Product Transfer Documents) 
  • Eligibility of specific feedstocks not listed in the Renewable Energy Directive (EU) 2018/2001 for e.g.  Animal Fat Cat 3 
  • Additional reporting instructions for future compliance years 
  • Expectations related to supporting evidence and SAF claims 

Obtaining clarification before reporting begins can provide greater certainty and reduce the risk of non-compliance. 

The challenge of harmonisation 

The absence of a standardised approach across the supply chain continues to create challenges for operators, fuel suppliers, verifiers, and competent authorities. Inconsistencies in documentation formats, sustainability certificate requirements, and reporting practices can increase the burden on all parties involved. Greater harmonisation across the industry would improve transparency, reduce administrative complexity, and facilitate more efficient reporting and verification. 

The importance of SAF tracking 

As SAF volumes increase, maintaining a dedicated SAF tracking file is becoming essential for efficient reporting and verification. A structured tracking system enables airlines to record SAF quantities, supplier information, sustainability certificates, and supporting documentation in a single location. This improves traceability, helps identify discrepancies early, and provides a clear audit trail throughout the reporting cycle. 

From a verification perspective, effective SAF tracking reduces information requests, supports data consistency, and facilitates a more efficient assessment of SAF claims — ultimately strengthening compliance and reporting accuracy. 

Looking ahead: The role of the Union Database 

The Union Database (UDB) is expected to play an increasingly important role in SAF traceability and reporting. By providing a centralised system for tracking SAF transactions, the UDB has the potential to improve transparency, reduce documentation inconsistencies, and strengthen confidence in sustainability claims. 

As the industry continues to mature, a robust UDB framework will be instrumental in supporting accurate reporting and long-term compliance.

Conclusion 

The success of SAF reporting depends not only on fuel procurement but also on the traceability of supporting documentation. Operators that engage early with fuel suppliers, seek clarification from competent authorities, and implement robust document management practices will be better positioned to navigate verification requirements efficiently. 

Preparation today can significantly reduce verification challenges tomorrow — helping operators achieve compliance while supporting the industry’s broader sustainability objectives. 

Want to create a safe and healthy working and living environment?

We test, inspect and certify so organizations can innovate safely, quickly, efficiently and cost-effectively.

Contact us

Fill out the form and we will contact you shortly.

Naam
Privacy Policy 

Related Services

A passenger plane is flying at cruising altitude above a layer of clouds.

Aviation & SAF

Related Articles

15 May 2026

Assessing the impact of low-carbon marine fuels: A technical audit of emission reductions and sustainability verification.

Freight transportation makes a significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing these emissions is a challenging task due to the complexity and scale of freight networks. While the financial burden often falls on freight carriers, shippers and logistics service providers (LSPs) can play a critical role in alleviating this challenge. By partnering with carriers, they can share the burden and demonstrate their commitment to a low-carbon economy. One promising approach to this is through low-carbon fuel programs.

15 May 2026

Aviation Carbon 2024, a great success!

Aviation Carbon 2024, co-organized by Normec Verifavia, successfully concluded on November 26, 2024, reinforcing its status as the longest-running "must-attend" aviation sustainability event. Thank you to all participants for making this possible! The conference brought together various stakeholders, including airlines, fuel suppliers, carbon market experts, policy makers and environmental organizations, to discuss the latest developments in sustainability, compliance and implications for the industry.

15 May 2026

Essential compliance for ReFuelEU aviation 2023/2405

The implementation of ReFuelEU imposes obligations on fuel suppliers, Union airports and aircraft operators, which are discussed in the following subsections.

Visual representation of the circular economy, the reuse of raw materials, and the sustainable management of natural resources.
01 May 2026

EU Launches Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF)

The European Union has taken a significant step toward achieving climate neutrality with the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2024/3012, establishing the Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF).

A moss-covered sphere lies on a forest floor, representing nature and sustainability.
01 May 2026

CSRD Scope Narrowed: But Are You Still Required to Verify Sustainability Reporting?

The European Commission’s Omnibus “Content Directive” entered into force on 18 March 2026, bringing final clarity to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive after more than a year of negotiation. EU Member States now have until 19 March 2027 to transpose the changes into national law. For organisations subject to CSRD, this is the moment to adjust your verification planning with confidence. The question is no longer whether CSRD will apply it is whether your organization remains in scope, and if not, whether voluntary verification still serves your business objectives.

Industrial emissions rise from smokestacks as part of a production or energy process.
01 May 2026

ETS 2 First Verification Cycle Complete: Lessons from Early Implementation

ETS 2 verifications have now been completed for the first reporting cycle, marking an important milestone in the expansion of the EU carbon market to transport and building fuels.

Visual representation of sustainability, the circular economy, and the responsible use of natural resources.
01 May 2026

EU Greenwashing Crackdown: What EmpCo and Green Claims Mean for Environmental Marketing

The European Union is significantly tightening its rules on greenwashing through two complementary pieces of legislation: the Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive (EmpCo) and the Green Claims Directive.