Accessibility links Skip to main content

SAF and RTFO: A certificate is only as good as what’s behind it

The RTFO and the SAF mandate are the two most important regulations in the United Kingdom aimed at reducing emissions from transportation fuels.¹ - The RTFO applies to road transport, non-road mobile machinery, and certain renewable marine fuels. - The SAF mandate applies to aviation and requires that SAF meet 2% of the UK’s aviation fuel demand starting in 2025, rising to 10% in 2030 and 22% in 2040.² Suppliers demonstrate compliance through certificates linked to eligible fuel, or pay a buyout fee for any shortfalls. Both schemes operate in the same way: a supplier makes a sustainability claim, earns a certificate, and trades or redeems it to meet a target. Simple in theory—but only as robust as the claim behind it.

Continue reading
Visual representation of sustainability, the circular economy, and the responsible use of natural resources.

Who Is Liable, and When

If you supply 450,000 liters or more of relevant transport fuel in the United Kingdom during a commitment year (January 1 through December 31), registration with the RTFO is mandatory.

Under the SAF mandate, which replaced the RTFO support for aviation fuels on January 1, 2025, suppliers must register as soon as they hold and supply 15.9 terajoules or more of aviation turbine fuel during a commitment year.²

Each year, obligated suppliers must surrender sufficient certificates to meet their obligation or pay the buyout price for any shortfall. Unused certificates may be carried over for one obligation year, while certificates from the previous year may cover up to 25% of the current obligation, providing flexibility without creating a long-term shortfall.¹

Verification takes place with every application

Each certificate is verified before issuance—not just once a year.

Verifiers must be accredited by the DfT administrator, with verification reports that comply with ISAE 3000 or equivalent standards. ³

Voluntary schemes such as ISCC or RSB can serve as evidence, but do not replace accredited verification.

For SAF, the evidence trail includes invoices, waybills, and weighbridge data—the physical quantity is just as important as sustainability.

Once a methodology for emissions or suitability has been selected, it must be applied consistently and may not be altered on a per-batch basis to influence the results. ³

Not all raw materials are the same

Eligibility of raw materials is determined based on DfT raw material tables, which are updated periodically.⁴

  • Waste materials and byproducts (used cooking oil, agricultural and fishery residues) can yield double credits per liter or kilogram.
  • RFNBOs such as green hydrogen are eligible only if strict energy-input requirements are met.
  • Recycled carbon fuels must meet the established RTFO eligibility criteria.
  • For crop-based fuels, a cap applies under the RTFO policy, and this cap is being gradually reduced.⁵
  • Blended or co-processed fuels yield certificates only for the renewable portion, which is assessed on a per-shipment basis.

Eligibility is not transferable between programs: materials eligible under the RTFO may be excluded under the SAF mandate.

SAF is no longer traceable once it is in the tank

SAF is typically blended with conventional Jet A-1, as aircraft fuel systems require specific performance characteristics. ²

Once blended, sustainable and fossil molecules are physically indistinguishable—the sustainability claim is supported solely by documentation.

Three elements support that claim:

  • Blend ratio—supported by test and production data
  • Proof of Sustainability (PoS)—issued under recognized certification schemes
  • Chain-of-custody documentation and invoices linking the material to the claim

If any of these elements weakens, so does the underlying certificate.

Where double counting comes into play

The risk of double-counting sustainability attributes exists in both the fuel and carbon markets; therefore, traceability and independent verification are central to both schemes.

RTFO, the SAF mandate, UK ETS, EU ETS, and CORSIA operate under different rules, so a claim accepted in one system cannot automatically be considered valid in another system without separate verification. This is precisely what independent verification is designed to detect: the same metric ton of feedstock or the same certificate appearing in two schemes, or a methodology applied one way in one submission and another way in the next.

The Heart of the Matter

Meeting targets makes the headlines. Certificates are only meaningful if the underlying evidence of sustainability, the chain of custody, and the blending data are accurate, and if controls prevent the same environmental label from being claimed twice.

That is the aspect that rarely makes the news. That is the area in which Normec Verifavia operates.

About Us

Normec Verifavia is a leader in third-party verification and has recently been added to the list of officially recognized verification bodies for RTFO and SAF mandates.

Sources

¹ RTFO: An Essential Guide – Department for Transport
² UK SAF Mandate: An Essential Guide – Department for Transport
³ Sustainability Criteria and Verification Requirements for the SAF Mandate – GOV.UK
⁴ List of feedstocks for the RTFO and SAF mandates – GOV.UK
⁵ Regulatory review of the RTFO and the future of the scheme – GOV.UK

Do you want to create a safe and healthy work and living environment?

We test, inspect, and certify so that organizations can innovate safely, quickly, efficiently, and cost-effectively.

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will contact you shortly.

Name
In which country would you like assistance?
Privacy Policy 

Related news articles

A passenger plane is being prepared for departure during ground handling operations at the airport.
17 Jun 2026

A Guide to SAF Documentation: Common Challenges and Best Practices

As the adoption of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) under aviation regulations continues to grow, the quality and traceability of documentation have become key considerations in SAF reporting and verification activities. Although SAF offers significant environmental benefits, operators must maintain accurate, complete, and verifiable data throughout the entire reporting period to demonstrate compliance. Based on our experience supporting aviation stakeholders in compliance and verification activities, several recurring challenges have emerged. Fortunately, many of these issues can be addressed through early planning and proactive collaboration with fuel suppliers and competent authorities.

A passenger plane is flying at cruising altitude above a layer of clouds.
18 Jun 2026

UK ETS: Consultation on the Treatment of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)

The UK Emissions Trading System (UK ETS) authority has launched a consultation to gather stakeholders’ views on the future treatment of SAF within the UK ETS framework, particularly in light of the introduction of the UK SAF mandate. The consultation examines potential changes to SAF eligibility criteria, sustainability requirements, greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction thresholds, and accounting methodologies, with the aim of strengthening policy alignment and supporting the decarbonization of the aviation sector.

An airplane is on the airport apron while ground handling operations are being carried out.
18 Jun 2026

Compliance with the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation in 2025: Verification Scope and Compliance Patterns

ReFuelEU Aviation (Regulation (EU) 2023/2405) is one of the European Union’s key measures to reduce aviation emissions by increasing the use of sustainable aviation fuels and discouraging economic refueling. For aircraft operators, Article 5(1) stipulates that at least 90% of the annual aviation fuel required for flights departing from an airport in the Union must be refueled at that airport in the Union. If this threshold is not met, Article 5(2) is invoked as justification, and EASA’s guidelines and monitoring tool support the monitoring and reporting process. The 2025 reporting year is also the first year in which competent authorities may impose penalties for non-compliance with Article 5(1) of the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation 2023/2405. In 2024, the first reporting year, the biggest challenge was setting up the monitoring and reporting process itself. By 2025, the picture has become clearer. The question is no longer just whether operators are reporting, but what the reports reveal about compliance behavior and the quality of the justifications provided. That is where this year’s verified information comes in handy.

A passenger plane is flying at cruising altitude beneath a clear sky with clouds.
18 Jun 2026

The Strategic Roadmap for 2026: The Path to Final Settlement of CORSIA Phase 1

The first phase of CORSIA is entering its final months. For most operators, the 2025 reporting cycle—which will be verified by independent bodies by April 30, 2026—represented the most demanding data processing operation since the program’s inception. However, a verified report is merely the “input” for a larger financial calculation. As 2026 progresses, the sector is operating in a two-track reality: Retrospective reconciliation: finalizing financial obligations for 2025. Forward-looking monitoring: Ensuring that the 2026 emissions year—the final year of the first phase—is tracked with absolute precision in the run-up to the April 2027 verification deadline.

Visual representation of the circular economy, the reuse of raw materials, and the sustainable management of natural resources.
01 May 2026

EU Launches Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF)

The European Union has taken a significant step toward achieving climate neutrality with the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2024/3012, establishing the Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF).

A moss-covered sphere lies on a forest floor, representing nature and sustainability.
01 May 2026

CSRD Scope Narrowed: But Are You Still Required to Verify Sustainability Reporting?

The European Commission’s Omnibus “Content Directive” entered into force on 18 March 2026, bringing final clarity to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive after more than a year of negotiation. EU Member States now have until 19 March 2027 to transpose the changes into national law. For organisations subject to CSRD, this is the moment to adjust your verification planning with confidence. The question is no longer whether CSRD will apply it is whether your organization remains in scope, and if not, whether voluntary verification still serves your business objectives.

Industrial emissions rise from smokestacks as part of a production or energy process.
01 May 2026

ETS 2 First Verification Cycle Complete: Lessons from Early Implementation

ETS 2 verifications have now been completed for the first reporting cycle, marking an important milestone in the expansion of the EU carbon market to transport and building fuels.

Sign up for the newsletter

Stay up to date on the latest news, exclusive updates, and valuable insights.

Sign up

Fill in the form and you’ll receive our newsletter shortly.

Naam
Privacy Policy 

Related services

A passenger aircraft is parked on the airport apron for service and handling operations.

ReFuelEU Aviation

Close-up of professionals reviewing documents and making notes during a business meeting, with laptops, paperwork and pens on a desk. The image represents reporting, documentation, quality assurance, compliance and collaboration.

EU MRV & ETS Emissions Report Verification

A large container ship carrying colorful shipping containers sailing on the open sea. The image depicts international logistics, transportation, and global supply chains.

Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII)

Close-up of a hand applying an official stamp to a document on a desk, with a laptop in the background. The image represents document approval, certification, compliance, quality assurance and administrative processes.

SEEMP Part II and III Verification

Low Carbon Fuel (LCF) Program and Insetting Audit